Healthcare organizations face a growing challenge, where patients are abandoning treatments before they even start. The main reason is often fragmented patient access where benefits verification (BV), prior authorization (PA) and direct-to-patient (DTP) services operate in silos. When these critical functions don't communicate, coverage gaps emerge, delays compound and patients fall through the cracks.
A coverage-first journey significantly changes the situation. By integrating BV, PA and DTP services into a unified workflow, healthcare organizations can deliver medications directly to patients faster and safer than ever before.
Key Takeaways |
|---|
|
Understanding the Three Pillars of Patient Access
Before exploring integration strategies, it's important to understand what each service delivers independently and why they're all critical to the patient journey.
Benefits Verification: The Foundation
Benefits verification is the process of confirming a patient's insurance coverage and eligibility before providing medical services. This includes validating plan details, coverage limitations, copayments, deductibles, and any pre-existing authorization requirements.
When done correctly, BV prevents the most common cause of claim denials: patient ineligibility. Healthcare providers can accurately estimate patient financial responsibilities and avoid unexpected billing disputes after services are rendered.
The challenge is that insurance landscapes change constantly. Plans update, patients switch coverage, and benefit structures vary dramatically between payers. Without real-time verification, providers risk submitting claims that will never be paid.
Prior Authorization: The Gatekeeper and a Major Barrier to Care
Prior authorization requires healthcare providers to obtain approval from insurance companies before delivering specific services, procedures or medications. Payers position PA as a cost-control mechanism, but for physicians and patients, it often becomes a significant barrier to care.
The administrative burden is staggering. Practices complete an average of 39 prior authorization requests per physician per week. Nearly 40% of physicians now employ staff who work exclusively on prior authorizations. This paperwork-intensive process pulls resources away from patient care and directly contributes to physician burnout.
More concerning are the clinical implications. According to the American Medical Association, 93% of physicians report that prior authorization delays patient care. Nearly one in four physicians has seen a patient experience a serious adverse event, including hospitalization, permanent impairment or death, because treatment was stalled waiting for authorization.
DTP Services: Home Delivery & Flexible Pickup
DTP services give patients direct access to medications through home delivery or coordinated pickup options. These programs enhance choice and convenience by linking fulfillment to verified coverage and authorization results.
A recent survey found that 42% of pharmaceutical companies are already running DTP programs, while another 30% plan to launch one within the next year. Only 6% have no current plans for DTP offerings.
Modern DTP programs let patients choose how and where they receive medications, at home, through a retail pharmacy or via curbside pickup. Platforms, like Alto Pharmacy, emphasize that they offer same‑day courier delivery, home shipping and in‑store pick‑up options. This flexibility allows patients to see their costs upfront, schedule deliveries or pick‑ups online, and receive real‑time updates once BV and PA steps are complete.
Here are a few examples that show how pickup augments home delivery:
LillyDirect and Walmart partnered in 2025 to let patients pick up Zepbound vials at any of Walmart’s 4,600 pharmacies; the collaboration gives “additional convenience, access and choice” to millions of Americans
PfizerForAll allows patients to have prescriptions delivered to their home or to pick them up at a preferred local pharmacy, blending digital convenience with in‑person options.
Beyond Delivery: Why Flexible Fulfillment Matters
Flexible fulfillment improves adherence and safety because it adapts to individual patient needs. Curbside pickup offers a contact‑minimal option that’s safer for patients with compromised immunity and faster for those with mobility challenges. Micro‑fulfillment centers and smart lockers extend this model, enabling “home delivery, curbside pickup, or secure smart lockers” for rapid access
Key benefits include:
Reducing missed doses: Centralized pick‑up at retail pharmacies or clinics provides secure storage and chain-of-custody for temperature-sensitive therapies.
Expanding access: Micro fulfillment centers bring medications to communities lacking nearby pharmacies, addressing pharmacy deserts.
Improving transparency: When BV and PA are integrated, patients know their costs and coverage before they choose a fulfillment option, leading to fewer abandoned therapies and better adherence.
How Integrating BV, PA and DTP Eliminates Redundancies and Delays
When BV, PA and DTP services operate independently, patients experience a fragmented journey filled with delays, redundant information requests, and unclear next steps. Each handoff between systems creates an opportunity for errors, lost information, and patient abandonment.
Integration addresses these problems by creating a single, continuous workflow from prescription to delivery.
Eliminating Redundant Coverage Checks with Shared Eligibility Data
In a siloed model, BV happens at scheduling, then again when the prescription is written and potentially again, when the specialty pharmacy receives the order. Each touchpoint requires the patient to confirm the same information and creates opportunities for discrepancies.
An integrated approach verifies coverage once and shares that verification across all downstream systems. The PA team already knows the patient's plan requirements. The DTP fulfillment system already understands which pharmacy network applies and what the patient's cost-share will be.
Accelerating Time‑to‑Therapy Through Synchronized Workflows
The most significant benefit of integration is speed. When electronic patient support services are connected at the point of prescribing, organizations have demonstrated a significant reduction in time to therapy.
This acceleration comes from eliminating wait times between steps. Instead of completing BV, then waiting for PA, then coordinating with the specialty pharmacy, integrated workflows trigger all three processes simultaneously. Authorization requests include benefit details from the start. DTP systems prepare for fulfillment while authorization is pending.
Why Cost Clarity Matters Before Fulfillment
Traditional workflows send prescriptions to pharmacies before verifying coverage. Patients discover affordability issues only after arriving to pick up medications, creating friction at the worst possible moment.
BV and PA support are considered crucial for patient support services. Real-time BV enables informed decision-making before patients invest time and emotional energy in the fulfillment process.
When patients understand their financial responsibility upfront, they can explore co-pay assistance programs, patient support options or alternative therapies before abandonment becomes the default response.
Building an Integrated Patient Access Workflow
Creating a coverage-first journey requires tight cooperation between technology, processes and teams.
Start with Real‑Time Eligibility Checks to Avoid Denials and Provide Cost Clarity
The first step is real-time BV at the point of care. Modern eligibility platforms connect directly to payer systems and return coverage information in seconds rather than days.
Key capabilities include:
Primary and secondary payer identification: Confirming all coverage sources before claims submission
Coordination of benefits checks: Determining which plan pays first and any coverage interactions
Prior authorization requirement flags: Identifying which services will need authorization before proceeding
Patient responsibility estimates: Calculating copays, deductibles, and coinsurance in real time
Organizations implementing real-time verification report reduced claim rejections, faster payments and improved patient satisfaction through upfront cost transparency.
Automate Prior Authorization Initiation
Once eligibility is confirmed and PA requirements are identified, integrated systems should automatically initiate authorization requests. This eliminates the lag time between identifying a PA requirement and actually submitting the request.
Electronic prior authorization tools that integrate with EHR systems enable:
Auto-population of clinical data: Pulling relevant documentation directly from patient records
Payer-specific form completion: Ensuring submissions meet each payer's unique requirements
Real-time status tracking: Visibility into authorization progress without phone calls
Denial management workflows: Immediate notification and appeal initiation when needed
The CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Rule now requires Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and ACA exchange plans to respond to urgent requests within 72 hours and routine requests within seven days. Integrated systems help organizations hold payers accountable to these timelines.
Link Authorization Status to DTP Fulfillment for Seamless Delivery
The final integration point connects authorization status directly to DTP services. When authorization is approved, fulfillment preparation begins immediately. Patients receive proactive communication about their medication, delivery options, and any remaining steps.
Effective DTP integration includes:
Pharmacy network routing: Automatically directing prescriptions to appropriate fulfillment channels based on coverage
Patient communication automation: Triggering outreach about delivery scheduling and cost responsibility
Adherence monitoring: Tracking refill timing and proactively supporting medication continuation
Cold chain management: Ensuring temperature-sensitive medications maintain integrity through delivery
Organizations implementing end-to-end integration report that patients can see price, pick a fulfillment path and follow clear next steps, reducing abandonment and improving days on therapy.
Technology Enablers for Integration
Successful integration depends on technology infrastructure that supports data sharing across functions and systems.
API-Based Connectivity
Modern patient access solutions rely on application programming interfaces to connect disparate systems. API-first architectures enable eligibility platforms, EHRs, authorization tools, and pharmacy systems to exchange information in real time.
Healthcare organizations should prioritize platforms offering:
HL7 FHIR compatibility: The emerging standard for healthcare data exchange
Bi-directional data flow: Information moving both to and from integrated systems
Webhook notifications: Real-time alerts when status changes occur
Vendor-neutral connectivity: Ability to integrate with multiple payer and pharmacy networks
AI and Automation
Artificial intelligence is increasingly central to patient access operations. AI-powered tools can verify eligibility in seconds, predict which services will require authorization based on payer patterns, and identify claims likely to be denied before submission.
Automation addresses the volume challenge. When practices handle 39 authorization requests per physician per week, manual processes simply cannot scale. Automation handles routine verifications and authorizations, freeing staff to focus on complex cases requiring human judgment.
Unified Dashboards
Integration is only valuable if teams can act on the connected information. Unified dashboards that display patient status across BV, PA, and DTP functions give staff visibility into bottlenecks and enable proactive intervention.
Effective dashboards surface patients who are stuck, waiting for authorization decisions, missing required documentation or at risk of therapy abandonment. This visibility transforms patient access from a reactive function to a proactive one.
Overcoming Integration Challenges
Despite clear benefits, integration presents real challenges that organizations must address.
Legacy System Constraints
Many healthcare organizations run on legacy technology that wasn't designed for modern integration patterns. EHRs may lack robust API capabilities. Revenue cycle systems may use proprietary data formats.
Organizations address these constraints through middleware solutions that translate between systems, phased modernization programs that replace legacy components over time, and vendor pressure to improve integration capabilities.
Workflow Redesign
Technology integration alone isn't sufficient. Organizations must redesign workflows to take advantage of connected systems. This requires change management, staff training, and often role redefinition.
Benefits verification staff may need to change their workflow to include authorization initiation. Authorization specialists may need visibility into DTP fulfillment status. These workflow changes can meet resistance if not managed carefully.
Payer Variability
Each payer maintains different requirements for eligibility verification, prior authorization, and pharmacy network access. Integration must account for this variability rather than assuming a single workflow running universally.
Successful organizations build rules engines that apply payer-specific logic while maintaining a consistent patient and staff experience. The complexity exists in the background; users see a streamlined workflow.
Measuring Integration Success
Organizations should track specific metrics to evaluate their coverage-first journey implementation.
Time-to-Therapy Metrics
The most important measure is how quickly patients move from prescription to first dose. Track:
Average days from prescription to authorization decision
Average days from authorization to medication delivery
Total days from prescription to first patient dose
Compare these metrics before and after integration to quantify improvement.
Denial and Abandonment Rates
Integration should reduce both claim denials and patient therapy abandonment. Monitor:
Prior authorization denial rate by payer
Patient abandonment rate during the access process
Prescription fill rate for authorized medications
Declining rates indicate that coverage-first workflows are working.
Administrative Cost
Integration should reduce the administrative burden on staff. Track:
Staff hours spent on benefits verification
Staff hours spent on prior authorization
Phone calls and faxes per patient case
The CAQH estimates that shifting administrative transactions to electronic methods could save the industry $20 billion. Organizations can capture a significant share of these savings.
Conclusion
The integration of BV, PA and DTP services isn't just an operational improvement, it's a fundamental shift toward putting coverage confirmation at the center of the patient journey. When patients know their coverage, understand their costs, and receive their medications without unnecessary delays, adherence improves and outcomes follow.
Healthcare organizations that embrace this integration will differentiate themselves in a market where patients increasingly expect the seamless, transparent experiences they receive in other industries. The technology exists. The regulatory environment supports it. The patients’ needs demand it. The question isn't whether to integrate these services, but how quickly organizations can make it happen.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What does a “coverage-first” patient access model mean?
A coverage-first model verifies insurance eligibility and cost obligations before a prescription is sent to fulfillment. This prevents avoidable claim denials, reduces patient abandonment and ensures that PA and DTP workflows start with accurate, shared benefits data.
Why is integrating BV, PA and DTP services so important?
When these services operate in silos, patients experience repeat data requests, long delays and unclear next steps. Integration creates a single, synchronized workflow that eliminates redundancy, reduces time-to-therapy and improves medication adherence.
How does integration reduce time-to-therapy?
Integrated systems initiate BV, PA and DTP processes simultaneously instead of sequentially. This coordination, paired with electronic PA submissions and automated fulfillment preparation, can shorten therapy initiation by more than 30% in many patient support models.
What delivery options are included in modern DTP programs?
DTP services now extend beyond home delivery. Patients can choose retail pharmacy pickup, curbside pickup and in some cases smart-locker retrieval or micro-fulfillment center pickup, giving them more control and improving adherence for those who cannot receive packages at home.
Sources
Share this article
Nicolas Kernick is Head of Growth and Operations at Develop Health, where he helps scale Al-driven solutions that streamline medication access and transform clinical workflows. He worked across the US and Europe for 10 years at BCG before leaving to join a tech startup called SandboxAQ. He holds a First Class Degree in Physics from the University of Cambridge and was a Baker Scholar at Harvard Business School. With a deep interest in healthcare innovation and technology, Nicolas writes about how Al can improve patient outcomes and reduce administrative burden across the heathcare ecosystem.






